1. Implementation of diversity among board members

The company has formulated the "Corporate Governance Code of Practice" to regulate that the board of directors structure should take diversity into consideration. The relevant regulations have been disclosed on the company's website and public information observatory.
Article 13 of the Company's Articles of Association stipulates that directors shall fully adopt a candidate nomination system, evaluate each candidate's academic experience and qualifications, and comply with the "Corporate Governance Code of Practice" to ensure the diversity of directors.
According to Article 20, Item 3 of the Company's "Corporate Governance Code of Practice", board members should generally possess the necessary knowledge, skills, and literacy to perform their duties and have diverse representation on the board of directors, and should give due consideration to the benefits of diversity on the board of directors.
The company's corporate governance code of practice approved by the board of directors has clearly stated the board diversity policy. There are currently 9 directors. The implementation of diversity among all directors is as follows:

Among the total directors, 22.2% are employee directors and 33.3% are independent directors. Female directors account for 11.1% and male directors account for 88.9%.
Age distribution of directors: 22.2% between 51 and 60 years old, 77.8% between 61 and 70 years old. As of March 28, 2020, the term of independent directors is the third year.

On May 26, 2012, an additional independent director was elected at the annual shareholders' meeting. As of November 8, 2012, there are currently 10 directors. The implementation of diversity among all directors is as follows:
Among all directors, 20% are employee directors and 40% are independent directors. Female directors account for 10% and male directors account for 90%.
Age distribution of directors: 20% between 51 and 60 years old, 50% between 61 and 70 years old, and 30% over 70 years old.

Members of the company's board of directors each have different professional fields and rich industry experience, which can achieve diversified and complementary effects on directors' execution of duties and corporate governance. The core diversification projects of each director are as follows:

2. Implementation of diversity among board members

1. Succession plan and operation of board members

1. The company's "Articles of Association" clearly stipulate that the election of directors shall adopt a candidate nomination system, and the "Corporate Governance Code of Practice" and "Director Election Methods" clearly stipulate that the composition of the board of directors should consider diversity. ization, and formulate diversified policies based on the company's own operations, operating types and development needs, including but not limited to two major aspects of standards: basic conditions and values, and professional knowledge and skills.

2. The company's ongoing director succession plan establishes a director candidate database based on the following standards: (1) Integrity, responsibility, innovation and Have decision-making ability, be consistent with the company's core values, and have professional knowledge and skills that will help the company's operation and management. (2) Have industrial experience related to the business operated by the company. (3) It is expected that the addition of this member will continue to provide the company with an effective, collaborative, diverse board of directors that meets the needs of the company. (4) Set up at least 1 female director, and the overall board expertise must include corporate strategy, accounting and taxation, finance, law, administrative management and production management. The company’s selection process for formulating a list of director candidates must comply with qualification reviews and relevant standards to ensure that when director seats become vacant or plans increase, suitable new director candidates can be effectively identified and selected.

3. The company also clearly defines the "Board of Directors Performance Evaluation Method", which measures items through performance evaluation, including control of company goals and tasks, awareness of responsibilities, participation in operations, and internal relationship management. and communication, professional functions and further training, internal control and specific opinion expressions, etc., to confirm the effective operation of the board of directors and evaluate the performance of directors as a reference for future selection of directors.